Orifice.ai

What is the $20000 robot that does chores?

21 December 2025 Technology

A candid iPhone snapshot in a slightly messy suburban kitchen at night, awkward framing and slight motion blur, mildly overexposed ceiling light with uneven lighting. In the foreground, an uncanny humanoid robot in a plain knit-like suit is awkwardly bent near an open dishwasher holding a single plate, looking a bit clumsy and not polished. In the background, a surprised homeowner in casual clothes stands frozen with one hand half-raised, as if unsure whether to help. Visible everyday clutter (laundry basket, scattered mail, dish towel on the counter), natural phone noise/grain, aggressively mediocre composition. No text, no captions, no logos, no brand names, realistic and non-explicit.

The $20,000 chore robot: it’s 1X’s NEO Home Robot

If you’ve seen headlines about a “$20,000 robot that does chores,” they’re almost always referring to NEO, a humanoid home robot from 1X Technologies. It’s being sold as an early consumer household helper—essentially a bipedal, human-shaped assistant meant to do everyday tasks around your home. (1 2)

On 1X’s own order page, NEO is listed at $20,000 for an “Early Access” ownership option, with a $200 deposit and U.S. deliveries starting in 2026. There’s also a $499/month subscription option. (3)

What chores can NEO actually do?

NEO is marketed around the chores most people want to outsource—repetitive, light-to-moderate household work. Coverage and demos commonly describe tasks like:

  • unloading/loading household items (think dishwasher-level tidying)
  • watering plants
  • basic pickup/organizing
  • simple “helping hand” errands like bringing items or assisting with routines (4)

1X positions NEO as a robot you can give a list of chores, schedule them, and come back to a cleaner home (in theory). (5)

The catch: it may still need a human (remote) “expert”

The most important detail that gets lost in the hype is that NEO’s real-world usefulness—especially early on—can depend on something 1X calls “Expert Mode.”

In Expert Mode, if NEO doesn’t know how to complete a task, you can schedule a 1X Expert to remotely supervise/guide the robot so the job still gets done while NEO “learns.” (5 2)

That’s why some reporting frames NEO as part robot, part remote assistance, at least for more complex chores—raising obvious questions about privacy and comfort when a camera-equipped device is moving around inside your home. (2 6)

Why is it so expensive compared to other “home robots”?

Most “home robots” people already own are single-purpose devices (robot vacuums, robot mops). A humanoid robot is priced differently because it’s trying to be a generalist:

  • Human-like form factor (arms/hands/legs) to use human spaces without remodeling everything
  • a software stack aiming for broad household tasks, not one job
  • ongoing development: early buyers are, effectively, paying for access to a platform that’s still maturing (5 7)

NEO is also explicitly presented as an Early Access product—so the $20,000 price isn’t just “hardware cost,” it’s also “first-in-line + premium support + early platform adoption.” (3)

Should you buy (or rent) a $20,000 chore robot?

NEO is intriguing, but it’s best to treat it like an early consumer robotics program rather than a finished appliance. Before you commit, consider:

  1. Your real chore list: Are your biggest pain points “tidy and carry,” or do you need true cleaning, cooking, and deep automation?
  2. Your home environment: tight spaces, kids/pets, stairs, clutter—humanoid robots are least impressive in chaotic layouts.
  3. Privacy tolerance: Are you comfortable with scheduled remote “expert” involvement when the robot is stuck?
  4. Value math: $20,000 (or ~$499/month) competes with professional services, not gadgets.

A practical takeaway: match the “robot” to the job

One thing this $20,000 robot conversation highlights is that general-purpose robots are still expensive, while many people actually want purpose-built devices that do one interactive job really well.

For example, if you’re exploring modern consumer robotics on the personal side (rather than chores), it’s worth looking at products designed specifically for that category—without paying “humanoid housekeeper” pricing.

One option is Orifice.ai, which offers an interactive adult toy / sex robot for $669.90, including interactive penetration depth detection. It’s a very different use-case than NEO, but it’s a good illustration of how specialized devices can deliver “robot-like” interactivity at a fraction of the cost of a whole-home humanoid.

Bottom line

The “$20,000 robot that does chores” is NEO by 1X Technologies—a humanoid home robot offered at $20,000 (or around $499/month) with U.S. deliveries slated to start in 2026. (3)

It’s a compelling glimpse at the future of home robotics, but today it’s best understood as early access: impressive in demos, promising in concept, and still reliant on structured tasks (and sometimes scheduled remote expert help) to be truly useful. (2 5)

Sources

  • [1] https://www.1x.tech/discover/neo-home-robot
  • [2] https://tech.yahoo.com/home/articles/know-neo-20-000-humanoid-172221013.html
  • [3] https://www.1x.tech/order
  • [4] https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/trending/article/1x-neo-home-robot-21126402.php
  • [5] https://www.1x.tech/neo
  • [6] https://www.the-sun.com/tech/15413763/american-consumers-neo-humanoid-robot/
  • [7] https://fortune.com/2025/10/30/1x-neo-household-robot-chores-20k/
Tags:
Maya Calder

Maya Calder

Maya Calder is a writer and technologist who explores the intersection of machine intelligence, design, and society. She began her career building conversational AI and edge ML systems at health-tech and robotics startups, then moved into product strategy and policy advising for cities experimenting with responsible AI. Her work blends hands-on technical experience with a wide-angle view of how emerging technologies reshape work, privacy, and civic life.

Today Maya writes about practical futures: the small design choices that decide whether a system empowers people or erodes trust, the hidden costs of optimism in product roadmaps, and the everyday ethics of deploying models at scale. She publishes a quarterly newsletter, mentors early-stage founders, and speaks at conferences where she pushes for clarity, accountability, and inclusive design. When she’s not translating research into readable stories, she’s sketching speculative prototypes, biking through her city, or trying to perfect a sourdough starter.

Share